- 註冊時間
- 2023-5-6
- 精華
- 在線時間
- 小時
- 米币
-
- 最後登錄
- 1970-1-1
累計簽到:5 天 連續簽到:1 天
|
Sexual Precocity in a 16-Month-Old: `/ p' H! Z, w: N% L
Boy Induced by Indirect Topical' U* O7 R. t ?1 e: y, Q5 t$ d. p! \+ Q$ d
Exposure to Testosterone; p4 y" i; c' m1 h, y8 T P
Samar K. Bhowmick, MD, FACE,1 Tracy Ricke, MD,2* b6 ^) R. I1 E* h! A' ?+ Y& V/ B9 M
and Kenneth R. Rettig, MD1
5 U" I/ \: H; G) y) @Clinical Pediatrics
3 I3 A5 o$ E+ I9 Q3 VVolume 46 Number 6
1 W* W5 }- e2 L5 x- c5 rJuly 2007 540-543
; {( A: L/ r, _$ C. T0 |7 }© 2007 Sage Publications
# O6 u- x. E0 b10.1177/0009922806296651* L7 X7 x; C, T6 _# P
http://clp.sagepub.com. O3 f( r+ S# D3 d K" V
hosted at' m# _5 [8 u3 D# X6 Z p
http://online.sagepub.com
7 d- O# ]4 A8 N+ ]0 n) ^ WPrecocious puberty in boys, central or peripheral,
5 R" _/ n1 q) Sis a significant concern for physicians. Central
1 S9 v- c* [. ]) v# gprecocious puberty (CPP), which is mediated. b8 f( |" o# f5 l( G0 \
through the hypothalamic pituitary gonadal axis, has
; F. f6 e& a, u" X5 }a higher incidence of organic central nervous system
4 S7 }) W A" ?/ v: e& jlesions in boys.1,2 Virilization in boys, as manifested
5 ]. W; N0 w ~3 w! T8 o7 ?by enlargement of the penis, development of pubic
+ ]. c6 ?, L$ L+ [9 Zhair, and facial acne without enlargement of testi-
5 O9 a. e7 s, o2 L0 lcles, suggests peripheral or pseudopuberty.1-3 We! r3 [+ v$ x8 u- H& F
report a 16-month-old boy who presented with the
1 A) t4 l c) h* Yenlargement of the phallus and pubic hair develop-/ p- m& r( c+ V+ i, W' F2 F
ment without testicular enlargement, which was due
& G! K2 t0 d6 N, T: `( p1 Hto the unintentional exposure to androgen gel used by
; Y5 j2 m; [- {7 U6 c: s' i+ n- ^the father. The family initially concealed this infor-7 W0 b. C9 m/ a* Y) ?' J
mation, resulting in an extensive work-up for this
3 `, V; F$ s/ ^2 Ichild. Given the widespread and easy availability of
3 @. d, o, X' c8 ~! M* Wtestosterone gel and cream, we believe this is proba-7 R: X3 }8 L3 R$ R+ m2 z
bly more common than the rare case report in the4 ~2 D* P* a6 l" r9 D6 `
literature.4
( W, r1 t9 n% e/ @, d8 t- PPatient Report2 h0 E9 S/ `. l- W; h4 Z
A 16-month-old white child was referred to the
- u1 i% T, W' fendocrine clinic by his pediatrician with the concern
4 [" ~1 X w, C6 @! B$ Wof early sexual development. His mother noticed8 B9 W4 {' K. I, M
light colored pubic hair development when he was0 H0 K7 _( P* S$ l
From the 1Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, 2University of3 _, A3 C) t8 I
South Alabama Medical Center, Mobile, Alabama.
) \* u$ X' \, N$ u: gAddress correspondence to: Samar K. Bhowmick, MD, FACE,# J) s T1 A& ^5 d: a; o6 }2 M
Professor of Pediatrics, University of South Alabama, College of
, b! `, ^( y* n# U. NMedicine, 2451 Fillingim St. Mastin 212, Mobile, AL 36617-2297;% s' I+ b: c3 m$ k6 V: [
e-mail: [email protected].
7 T, q6 ~9 W2 @, uabout 6 to 7 months old, which progressively became* s4 c) d: C6 A, Z
darker. She was also concerned about the enlarge-
/ A9 h5 {/ U- z5 m/ x, X: sment of his penis and frequent erections. The child
9 b" A& B( b/ d& r/ N* Q0 g! L* Wwas the product of a full-term normal delivery, with
- Z( @) A8 v8 G+ L6 i, ra birth weight of 7 lb 14 oz, and birth length of
~' p3 v4 Z$ o. `. M; [20 inches. He was breast-fed throughout the first year1 I T/ N, M/ b" r
of life and was still receiving breast milk along with
: R7 R5 w; d7 ~solid food. He had no hospitalizations or surgery,1 q; R7 y6 C; m h
and his psychosocial and psychomotor development
' j Y' S p+ J" ^7 ~6 ewas age appropriate.' i4 g. }$ ^ ~ w# ]- X
The family history was remarkable for the father,6 e8 C) h% C. Y. g
who was diagnosed with hypothyroidism at age 16,
$ O3 X I( z3 j9 L; q7 ]which was treated with thyroxine. The father’s* {+ f7 q. s$ i- o, `' g
height was 6 feet, and he went through a somewhat$ j. {8 G1 g1 |; ~! ~/ z" ^5 P
early puberty and had stopped growing by age 14.% C1 U9 a7 Y# {9 y
The father denied taking any other medication. The
3 K P5 m# `9 w- w Jchild’s mother was in good health. Her menarche. B( E; }, \4 p; Z6 ^/ U& G
was at 11 years of age, and her height was at 5 feet
' L: r0 p: S r& U) |/ r, Q5 inches. There was no other family history of pre-
) C3 S! u- A7 Q/ icocious sexual development in the first-degree rela-
. G1 o* f S @tives. There were no siblings.
; L$ T5 g& z( d. Q9 r2 XPhysical Examination
" W9 `' {2 F; l9 a! o9 ^* f6 d0 T AThe physical examination revealed a very active,
6 G8 X; i W1 F( ]* b, {+ Q0 b$ qplayful, and healthy boy. The vital signs documented! _& R8 c3 [# Y9 x' D1 `
a blood pressure of 85/50 mm Hg, his length was
8 s1 a, P( \) L' ]; M+ ~, D, ~90 cm (>97th percentile), and his weight was 14.4 kg% x u, r, L3 @7 Q
(also >97th percentile). The observed yearly growth
% K2 n7 q2 R- \velocity was 30 cm (12 inches). The examination of, ?: m- J+ G" B, P/ h
the neck revealed no thyroid enlargement.
+ Q# O8 |7 q7 K) H$ M: ` ]The genitourinary examination was remarkable for- `- f# S1 {; v0 b# u& }; _
enlargement of the penis, with a stretched length of. D, n& Y- x% ~' n8 ~
8 cm and a width of 2 cm. The glans penis was very well
" F0 M1 D) p2 H* p$ v6 Ydeveloped. The pubic hair was Tanner II, mostly around
# E4 v! h) Y' x: j540 b- d# b8 O* B7 l0 D# e+ r
at University of Manchester Library on May 25, 2015 cpj.sagepub.com Downloaded from
4 i* V" L& }+ uthe base of the phallus and was dark and curled. The
* W( S5 m! W9 H9 ctesticular volume was prepubertal at 2 mL each.2 V* `3 z+ d' X p
The skin was moist and smooth and somewhat, z. j; ]/ C5 ~( N* {
oily. No axillary hair was noted. There were no
7 e3 [$ v; n8 I. `# a3 Q" H) vabnormal skin pigmentations or café-au-lait spots.+ c5 w1 p, D# P `. Z$ s
Neurologic evaluation showed deep tendon reflex 2+
6 |" z! R7 Y# j, t1 tbilateral and symmetrical. There was no suggestion
2 l% W2 ?3 a& c" aof papilledema.
( t. t0 b# t7 ALaboratory Evaluation9 Q2 C: h: u, I" i- m' l
The bone age was consistent with 28 months by
, z: O2 E) A: ousing the standard of Greulich and Pyle at a chrono-
( _0 b+ _9 X rlogic age of 16 months (advanced).5 Chromosomal, Q; ]! j/ { @- l- J
karyotype was 46XY. The thyroid function test
% z3 h h/ \7 ^. a3 l" L* Oshowed a free T4 of 1.69 ng/dL, and thyroid stimu-
: ~/ F& E; \/ x$ zlating hormone level was 1.3 µIU/mL (both normal).% x* U$ w: O* h$ F+ u3 {
The concentrations of serum electrolytes, blood( l7 h; o# `( v* g/ i- B) R
urea nitrogen, creatinine, and calcium all were
& B8 E" s W) u# g7 q A: `within normal range for his age. The concentration8 y9 R& {+ c5 B1 g% v6 q
of serum 17-hydroxyprogesterone was 16 ng/dL/ Y3 N' h# {% @6 @' g/ O
(normal, 3 to 90 ng/dL), androstenedione was 20+ H- a$ t8 v( j4 ~- O3 ~
ng/dL (normal, 18 to 80 ng/dL), dehydroepiandros-
% A# m8 {' w7 {7 E3 w1 pterone was 38 ng/dL (normal, 50 to 760 ng/dL),
: W- s0 b- K1 O: K5 s0 m) zdesoxycorticosterone was 4.3 ng/dL (normal, 7 to
" w7 L0 t `& |) h' j' V6 ]+ i49ng/dL), 11-desoxycortisol (specific compound S)
8 s# j y: }) u1 Y/ h1 Qwas 43 ng/dL (normal, 10 to 156 ng/dL), serum cor-
) Q u! V0 U. I+ L+ q, Ltisol was 7.6 µg/dL (normal, 2.8 to 23 µg/dL), total1 i$ c: q. z( e
testosterone was 60 ng/dL (normal <3 to 10 ng/dL),
' x8 c" T# c. _! B2 Gand β-human chorionic gonadotropin was less than% h( o. T, l( A9 y' Y, Q! a
5 mIU/mL (normal <5 mIU/mL). Serum follicular, a3 [+ _! D) A! I% S3 w
stimulating hormone and leuteinizing hormone
H7 [' d* `* N4 @concentrations were less than 0.05 mIU/mL' w. U4 e: V- U. P* r' J
(prepubertal).
! f; c- E8 S: S) f; T' f. W6 J' IThe parents were notified about the laboratory
* M3 q8 `- }: ~( o% Q4 p' eresults and were informed that all of the tests were2 N1 J) r% I# M+ d$ W: r
normal except the testosterone level was high. The
; @0 h0 b+ L0 ]( efollow-up visit was arranged within a few weeks to/ w' p) z* N. g) s; }
obtain testicular and abdominal sonograms; how-0 e) _" R9 u9 r6 e }) \
ever, the family did not return for 4 months.
3 A8 x; Q; j( z |2 c% V/ zPhysical examination at this time revealed that the; }$ y. I: g2 i
child had grown 2.5 cm in 4 months and had gained
4 ~0 {, }" R* g6 {9 z2 kg of weight. Physical examination remained
1 u7 [$ m, i0 A2 j7 ?unchanged. Surprisingly, the pubic hair almost com-! r8 ^" j0 V. H# ^. _6 k
pletely disappeared except for a few vellous hairs at
/ g# ~, o7 K7 V# Q2 a1 t0 `9 ?3 Gthe base of the phallus. Testicular volume was still 2- t# m, h0 L/ q# _- P/ }
mL, and the size of the penis remained unchanged.
. I" v% o. i0 l7 [4 U. gThe mother also said that the boy was no longer hav-
* P0 e* J5 N5 X5 u. d# Ning frequent erections.1 k n. M! P) ~: G. a
Both parents were again questioned about use of
/ [6 s: Q: y" d2 a5 Q. u' {any ointment/creams that they may have applied to6 c2 I. m$ `" h# o# _
the child’s skin. This time the father admitted the; t0 F8 ^4 _5 A s" t, g6 U
Topical Testosterone Exposure / Bhowmick et al 5416 A) E, R0 T( g( L! m
use of testosterone gel twice daily that he was apply-
, F- G, @0 X. M) ?4 G0 eing over his own shoulders, chest, and back area for
* |8 J2 z" M+ O8 _) q, Q9 sa year. The father also revealed he was embarrassed. E N/ X! p& e C2 n3 ]
to disclose that he was using a testosterone gel pre-
. x2 O, G2 d. c" f v# t2 Tscribed by his family physician for decreased libido4 ?2 I0 ^. F+ ~" @8 c
secondary to depression.
9 f ^0 F2 A. pThe child slept in the same bed with parents.
5 l5 J3 C3 ]$ }% AThe father would hug the baby and hold him on his
, @5 _0 Q! p$ \' F- uchest for a considerable period of time, causing sig-: x. e. q+ V4 y& k+ t. k- }
nificant bare skin contact between baby and father. ]8 V# a- ]* v, ~1 s7 { U% t
The father also admitted that after the phone call,6 H; D3 \( ?+ f" i6 X- F* D
when he learned the testosterone level in the baby
' O4 i: }% `- r2 h- ]! ]was high, he then read the product information& u' g$ z. ]; i9 d4 A% U
packet and concluded that it was most likely the rea-5 o1 N6 G. p% r
son for the child’s virilization. At that time, they
0 u7 I3 W2 r/ v: A+ V7 t2 X7 fdecided to put the baby in a separate bed, and the5 I9 X- v G+ H6 a) x1 V" g
father was not hugging him with bare skin and had
! Z9 ^8 u: ?) t& t6 `, {1 v+ kbeen using protective clothing. A repeat testosterone
; A* k' [) G0 Y( c4 z4 Btest was ordered, but the family did not go to the
3 x. d* M" \9 x* p2 B3 wlaboratory to obtain the test.
8 l: p' ]( y: c& H7 }9 J' FDiscussion: j( A: T! T/ [
Precocious puberty in boys is defined as secondary' W$ C& B3 I% y$ Z
sexual development before 9 years of age.1,4
; c( X- _" [' ^Precocious puberty is termed as central (true) when
$ T0 p+ h6 [, B, R5 {) G4 Yit is caused by the premature activation of hypo-
( j- r6 x/ {. K n# b" B7 Xthalamic pituitary gonadal axis. CPP is more com-
$ |0 k; g) j3 V# o5 o1 G0 p, z+ dmon in girls than in boys.1,3 Most boys with CPP
- H+ h) E w8 Q2 O: O- Xmay have a central nervous system lesion that is
2 w. f( w+ t4 M. dresponsible for the early activation of the hypothal-
b- I8 Y* c6 V8 c wamic pituitary gonadal axis.1-3 Thus, greater empha-: `/ G4 ]0 o5 N# o4 V. n
sis has been given to neuroradiologic imaging in# `5 P5 Q4 c ~: m
boys with precocious puberty. In addition to viril-6 ]4 }" j9 ?; h; C" D
ization, the clinical hallmark of CPP is the symmet-
- _% r, D# Y" z# \rical testicular growth secondary to stimulation by
& s2 p% |; R3 H: C" m! k* m; g- zgonadotropins.1,3
6 R, _: k& [& b% WGonadotropin-independent peripheral preco-
8 p0 w. {+ s" h7 f: G9 K G1 Mcious puberty in boys also results from inappropriate
$ r' j8 a9 q3 [3 ]! `# wandrogenic stimulation from either endogenous or8 T8 f2 |& j! N) y
exogenous sources, nonpituitary gonadotropin stim-
+ ?" s* Z' d& o; e: a) dulation, and rare activating mutations.3 Virilizing) o% k+ Y" K' A* ~3 s& l
congenital adrenal hyperplasia producing excessive
0 ]* H8 F0 ?8 ?' `& i' }adrenal androgens is a common cause of precocious; B0 u$ o: |7 x+ A. |
puberty in boys.3,4) ~) b) v" q( R4 q/ [) C( f
The most common form of congenital adrenal
' s, W" J" m9 H7 y6 uhyperplasia is the 21-hydroxylase enzyme deficiency.
8 G7 n) }6 L, `! A3 \! XThe 11-β hydroxylase deficiency may also result in. H; a( G- _# U7 |0 W: w% ]4 R
excessive adrenal androgen production, and rarely,
) e! G3 y. y! n# D0 i$ w* R' man adrenal tumor may also cause adrenal androgen
" s$ o6 X, Y+ \# B+ g) Yexcess.1,3# V, z {. n2 d$ n% ?, ]
at University of Manchester Library on May 25, 2015 cpj.sagepub.com Downloaded from: F- S. I4 @7 t
542 Clinical Pediatrics / Vol. 46, No. 6, July 2007
# g5 t" u3 ~$ ~! G& [A unique entity of male-limited gonadotropin-
9 q1 L( h X0 {7 C: Tindependent precocious puberty, which is also known
* U9 _( k1 m2 T# V2 q0 h Sas testotoxicosis, may cause precocious puberty at a
. t9 i( h( l- U4 u4 l: J- q. w1 e8 a! Dvery young age. The physical findings in these boys
* }: d) P! S! E' Ywith this disorder are full pubertal development,
% V, ~! y5 a' A; p6 s5 R R/ Nincluding bilateral testicular growth, similar to boys
3 L- A# D5 K! I1 J5 [( Ywith CPP. The gonadotropin levels in this disorder
, j" ^7 _: B* K3 dare suppressed to prepubertal levels and do not show/ c1 q+ [1 s9 n; [3 {$ o
pubertal response of gonadotropin after gonadotropin-
2 P9 E ?1 g$ f+ Ereleasing hormone stimulation. This is a sex-linked5 { l* U5 u* l. d3 ]8 v
autosomal dominant disorder that affects only8 `: V2 Y9 o# ]1 F# K4 F+ h
males; therefore, other male members of the family% z' p6 F0 r+ @; c0 h3 m
may have similar precocious puberty.3! R2 J, m- r4 g5 k; H* `$ y
In our patient, physical examination was incon-- \. Z# s7 D" ^( `6 K
sistent with true precocious puberty since his testi-
! Y0 ~9 |5 p. ocles were prepubertal in size. However, testotoxicosis+ ^! y+ f3 y/ s: `
was in the differential diagnosis because his father
2 T: h( N, x% u; dstarted puberty somewhat early, and occasionally,
8 I* G9 n1 j' s, D: Qtesticular enlargement is not that evident in the" j" `1 @ [# c4 D
beginning of this process.1 In the absence of a neg-
; H8 P2 ]* [/ q: O7 A5 vative initial history of androgen exposure, our
2 V5 R. r& Q5 `5 r8 b) ` ?biggest concern was virilizing adrenal hyperplasia,* y/ _; K" p5 B) L6 s, f- h4 c
either 21-hydroxylase deficiency or 11-β hydroxylase
' ]0 V# `6 |. D9 vdeficiency. Those diagnoses were excluded by find-5 e) X- ~5 z- Q0 U0 H# {3 l
ing the normal level of adrenal steroids.
7 t. [$ ]) I. |The diagnosis of exogenous androgens was strongly
) Q* d2 K! O3 t9 w) m9 Qsuspected in a follow-up visit after 4 months because
2 _$ |5 i" V* g4 \" f' s7 qthe physical examination revealed the complete disap-% w9 o1 |. d9 N# s+ h: [9 W
pearance of pubic hair, normal growth velocity, and
4 p& ?3 M q3 L5 d3 V! b6 L6 N1 T8 mdecreased erections. The father admitted using a testos-
% z$ V* F/ g6 @; a; h; o ]0 ?terone gel, which he concealed at first visit. He was: o7 j( r4 r2 Q) C; a; H* x |
using it rather frequently, twice a day. The Physicians’
9 Q5 V/ E0 r; R/ a' [Desk Reference, or package insert of this product, gel or7 ^- |4 i1 X+ Z$ F U1 b
cream, cautions about dermal testosterone transfer to1 F d2 A3 A3 ]2 _' v# G
unprotected females through direct skin exposure." T. y2 F4 m8 V0 P4 k y6 ^
Serum testosterone level was found to be 2 times the- {, g# J r& r4 f# p+ K1 b# o- g: v
baseline value in those females who were exposed to
# i y ]) ]) C+ c. Seven 15 minutes of direct skin contact with their male; l% w: L6 x t& J5 a. O+ V) R, S
partners.6 However, when a shirt covered the applica-
# e% U' r* P5 o; ^tion site, this testosterone transfer was prevented.# X/ G2 i' L0 I6 |2 T4 Q" \
Our patient’s testosterone level was 60 ng/mL,
+ Y" f9 |. e" J, O' e- |which was clearly high. Some studies suggest that
0 r6 g. ?& f) E% w; tdermal conversion of testosterone to dihydrotestos-
( z ]8 N, Y/ ^3 S/ p9 k. `5 O' Fterone, which is a more potent metabolite, is more
- j/ l% Q2 c( C$ J& X; l4 k/ yactive in young children exposed to testosterone$ l- y1 o( z! H$ T3 v
exogenously7; however, we did not measure a dihy-2 K" {- u* \. q
drotestosterone level in our patient. In addition to* Q/ j2 W& E' `+ F0 O
virilization, exposure to exogenous testosterone in
0 p+ F- ~& d3 A+ l3 F5 o- j/ ychildren results in an increase in growth velocity and; r+ O$ z9 Z# S7 c2 E
advanced bone age, as seen in our patient.6 ^! D: L4 t' S: _/ t- Q
The long-term effect of androgen exposure during
2 _) |" Z _, U6 R/ y4 eearly childhood on pubertal development and final/ i% y- Z/ c( q" E
adult height are not fully known and always remain+ w! O Q( a: r( p
a concern. Children treated with short-term testos-- j* U9 c% J8 w0 \" W' e3 H
terone injection or topical androgen may exhibit some
: q- C9 p# J) Tacceleration of the skeletal maturation; however, after
# u8 ^4 @' k$ v+ T0 Mcessation of treatment, the rate of bone maturation9 u# H8 e, f+ t y% z
decelerates and gradually returns to normal.8,9& a. C2 |9 H) W8 `
There are conflicting reports and controversy
/ e6 j% k! `! q8 ~$ z% M2 D# s& `over the effect of early androgen exposure on adult
" G3 a( u2 {1 h9 c$ m! ^penile length.10,11 Some reports suggest subnormal
7 {! L2 S+ l4 q" V C, Gadult penile length, apparently because of downreg-+ c! c1 o( P1 B
ulation of androgen receptor number.10,12 However,
; M8 c" t: `) E* i( `3 iSutherland et al13 did not find a correlation between
( B- T. J& O3 C ~0 `: lchildhood testosterone exposure and reduced adult
& G8 ^* d0 K1 x, Tpenile length in clinical studies.
6 ^0 k) ]# w. Q' w2 x; C m) Q; T- |Nonetheless, we do not believe our patient is" w e% Y! B* \! \, `) Q
going to experience any of the untoward effects from+ y4 K- f% _4 |4 C; E
testosterone exposure as mentioned earlier because
; J2 G9 k# L2 _the exposure was not for a prolonged period of time.7 M: W4 a. R, M/ x
Although the bone age was advanced at the time of* A' @4 y5 o; f1 h0 j+ L
diagnosis, the child had a normal growth velocity at7 X7 M; f5 L0 w* K% M& ^" Y, I( L
the follow-up visit. It is hoped that his final adult& }, F, i2 i. P( q
height will not be affected.$ ]% x+ q" B' R9 `, i+ ^
Although rarely reported, the widespread avail-
5 J* s% y Y. a( {, ~, e# F0 w) v" Rability of androgen products in our society may
8 }' q/ z9 V7 @indeed cause more virilization in male or female
6 S: r$ _3 o. l, mchildren than one would realize. Exposure to andro-7 \& N: S6 J+ d% r+ q5 N9 c1 T
gen products must be considered and specific ques-% t. k L% F2 l* |3 {/ ^0 n" ^
tioning about the use of a testosterone product or5 j k+ _1 q$ O2 w8 t4 w
gel should be asked of the family members during
" U6 H' O: Q" B1 T1 R; xthe evaluation of any children who present with vir-
" K {( V. @( i% Pilization or peripheral precocious puberty. The diag-
0 _- Z2 \1 a' |" b+ ?nosis can be established by just a few tests and by
L1 G0 [% z/ V9 b# I; Z" Vappropriate history. The inability to obtain such a
7 ?5 L* k7 W) rhistory, or failure to ask the specific questions, may
! B6 w3 A( q4 V" s4 X1 n" r0 Presult in extensive, unnecessary, and expensive
- N( f5 ^& N6 [investigation. The primary care physician should be+ S. G7 a! `3 \! g2 k# F. h: b
aware of this fact, because most of these children
7 t* r* J* s$ h( _( x$ H8 Umay initially present in their practice. The Physicians’# L# }0 K2 y1 [) ?) ]# l/ K* q6 B% T
Desk Reference and package insert should also put a5 X5 w( D$ Y& ]+ r7 ~' a& n) p/ B
warning about the virilizing effect on a male or
: f+ F) c7 B" _female child who might come in contact with some-& ]: v& c( R2 t9 P- k
one using any of these products.3 e. e6 b6 G6 r, M
References7 k2 I. R% v/ R6 d$ Z
1. Styne DM. The testes: disorder of sexual differentiation
4 j* ]+ R6 @3 ~) ~# q4 v) _and puberty in the male. In: Sperling MA, ed. Pediatric
/ Z5 F& ?& F8 t4 J/ [, {! nEndocrinology. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders;7 _1 v N1 d" N7 l8 j3 j5 ?
2002: 565-628./ ~ f$ c/ w3 t: @% b2 X7 z4 ^
2. Rivarola M, Belgorosky A, Mendilaharzu H, et al. Precocious, Y% _1 j* {: E3 s: v- n' n# j
puberty in children with tumours of the suprasellar pineal |
|